Skip to main content
. 2006 Dec 5;4(14):413–437. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2006.0179

Table 1.

Examples of commercially created skin substitutes.

commercial product name and manufacturer epidermal component dermal component advantages disadvantages
epidermal substitutes Epicel Genzyme Tissue repair Corporation cultured epidermal autograft grown from patient skin biopsy none large area of permanent wound coverage with little risk of rejection three weeks required to produce fragile confluent sheets, susceptible to blistering post-grafting
Laserskin Fidia Advanced Biopolmers cultured autologous keratinocytes from skin biopsy in a perforated hyaluronic acid membrane none a less fragile delivery system for keratinocytes. Hyaluronic acid/cell interaction properties improve mechanical stability minimum of three weeks required to expand keratinocyte population
EpiDex Modex Therapeutiques cultured autologous outer root sheath hair follicle cells none cells have increased proliferative capacity and can be cryopreserved for repeat applications. Success in chronic ulcer treatment substitute takes up to six weeks after harvesting to produce. Product fragile
Myskin CellTran cultured autologous keratinocytes on a PVC polymer coated with a plasma-polymerized surface Myskin with dermal fibroblasts under development PVC encourages keratinocyte attachment and proliferation, providing a more stable delivery platform. Keratinocytes can be thawed for repeated application up to 14 days required for cell expansion. Repeated application needed for good clinical outcome
dermal substitutes Alloderm Life Cell Corporation none processed cadaver allograft skin processing helps reduce antigenic components. Successful in resurfacing full-thickness burns problems of graft rejection and disease transfer
Dermagraft Advanced Biohealing, Inc. none allogeneic neonatal fibroblasts on a three-dimensional bioabsorbable scaffold neonatal fibroblast rapidly proliferate to produce collagen, GAGs and growth factors to aid wound healing potential risk of rejection and disease risk from fibroblasts, although none reported
Integra Johnson & Johnson synthetic polysiloxane polymer bovine type I collagen and GAGs encourages ingrowth of fibroblasts and epithelial cells. Epidermal equivalent replaced after 14 days with an autograft bovine collagen presents and antigenicity and disease risk. Three weeks required to expand the dermal autograft
Transcyte Advanced Biohealing, Inc. thin silicone layer (Biobrane) collagen-coated nylon mesh seeded with neonatal allogeneic fibroblasts successfully used to treat second- and third-degree burns. Dermal fibroblasts secrete collagen, GAGs and growth factors to aid wound healing nylon mesh not biodegradable. Rejection and disease risk from fibroblasts
Permacol Tissue Sciences Laboratories none porcine-derived acellular dermal matrix non-immunogenic due to processing to remove non-collagenous and cellular material. Supports host fibroblast infiltration and revascularization revascularization sometimes inefficient to support overlying epidermal graft
composite substitutes Apligraf Organogenesis human allogeneic neonatal keratinocytes human allogeneic neonatal foreskin fibroblasts in bovine type I collagen, ECM proteins and cytokines graft take comparable to autografts with good cosmetic results. Improves granulation tissue deposition and no signs of rejection observed risk of chronic graft rejection and disease from allogeneic keratinocytes and fibroblasts. Requires repeated applications
OrCel Ortec International human allogeneic neonatal keratinocytes human allogeneic neonatal foreskin fibroblasts in a bovine collagen sponge provides a favourable environment for host cell migration and provides a source of cytokines and growth factors not intended for use as a permanent skin replacement. Designed as a biological dressing. Risk of rejection and disease from bovine collagen and other cells.