Skip to main content
. 2002 Feb;11(2):280–291. doi: 10.1110/ps.19202

Table 2.

Docking unbound subunits

Receptor Ligand ICM dockinga Other docking methodsb
Complex PDB PDB Res (Å) PDB Res (Å) Original maps Optimized maps Refinement Nussinovc FTDOCKd FTDOCKe BiGGERf
Protease-inhibitor
    1ca0 5cha 1.67 1aap 1.50 24 of 4153 (1.7) 6 of 228 (1.4) 1 of 228 (1.2)
    1cbw 5cha 1.67 1bpi 1.10 167 of 5492 (1.2) 5 of 231 (0.9) 1 of 231 (0.7)
    1acb 5cha 1.67 1egl NMR 3981 of 4511 (B.D.)g 135 of 239 (B.D.)g 102 of 239 (Backbone Def.)g
    1cho 5cha 1.67 1omu NMR 10 of 5063 (1.2) 7 of 242 (2.6) 1 of 242 (1.0) 2 of 2289 (1.6) 11 of 86 (1.2) 1 of 86 (1.3) 6 of 1000 (2.9)
    1cgi 1chg 2.50 1hpt 2.30 18 of 5261 (3.6) 8 of 256 (3.4) 12 of 256 (3.1) 3 of 94 (1.8) 3 of 94 (2.2) 9 of 1000 (3.7)
    2kai 2pka 2.05 1bpi 1.10 823 of 4078 (3.8) 36 of 241 (4.1) 2 of 241 (5.5) 9 of 4222 (1.2) 130 of 364 (1.5) 2 of 364 (1.3) Not found
    2sni 2st1 1.80 2ci2 2.00 243 of 4286 (2.9) 66 of 220 (2.5) 1 of 220 (2.9) 92 of 3582 (2.6) 8 of 26 (1.8) 4 of 26 (2.6) 16 of 1000 (1.3)
    2sic 2st1 1.80 3ssi 2.30 67 of 4109 (2.4) 37 of 223 (2.4) 7 of 223 (1.9) Not found 15 of 1000 (3.3)
    1cse 1sbc 2.50 1egl NMR 70 of 7378 (B.D.)g 167 of 246 (B.D.)g 40 of 246 (Backbone Def.)g
    2tec 1thm 1.37 1egl NMR 172 of 5613 (B.D.)g 175 of 247 (B.D.)g 146 of 247 (Backbone Def.)g
    1taw 5ptp 1.34 1aap 1.50 288 of 4086 (2.2) 1 of 228 (3.5) 1 of 228 (2.9)
    2ptc 5ptp 1.34 1bpi 1.10 569 of 4632 (1.8) 41 of 229 (1.0) 3 of 229 (2.0) 1 of 3453 (1.2) 16 of 229 (1.5) 11 of 229 (1.6) 52 of 1000 (2.7)
    3tgi 1ane 2.20 1bpi 1.10 1756 of 5718 (1.1) 23 of 243 (0.6) 1 of 243 (0.8)
    1brc 1bra 2.20 1aap 1.50 87 of 4651 (2.3) 1 of 237 (3.7) 1 of 237 (1.8)
Enzyme-inhibitor
    1fss 2ace 2.50 1fsc 2.00 66 of 6649 (1.7) 51 of 264 (1.5) 7 of 264 (1.7) 11 of 1000 (3.2)
    1bvn 1pif 2.30 2ait NMR 2689 of 5858 (1.8) 2 of 265 (5.0) 7 of 265 (5.0)
    1bgs 1a2p 1.50 1a19 2.76 139 of 6279 (3.9) 55 of 290 (3.4) 212 of 290 (4.2) 35 of 1000 (1.9)
    1ay7 1rge 1.15 1a19 2.76 484 of 4765 (3.9) 208 of 284 (5.2) 156 of 284 (6.2)
    TEM1h retmh 1.90 bliph 2.10 1 of 4512 (2.4) 2 of 240 (2.8) 12 of 240 (3.1)
    1ugh 1akz 1.57 2ugi 2.20 72 of 6560 (2.4) 9 of 300 (2.8) 9 of 300 (4.8)
Electron transport
    2pcb 1ccp 2.20 1hrc 1.90 3307 of 5193 (2.3) 80 of 252 (4.1) 46 of 252 (3.2) 18 of 1000 (2.4)
    2pcf 1ctm 2.30 1ag6 1.70 19 of 6037 (5.3) 58 of 283 (4.9) 9 of 283 (5.2)
Antibody-antigen
    1mlc 1mlb 2.10 1lza 1.60 2435 of 5099 (3.3) 21 of 259 (5.3) 16 of 259 (5.1) 41 of 590 (1.2) Not found
    1vfb 1vfa 1.80 11za 1.60 51 of 4253 (B.D.)g 30 of 291 (B.D.)g 75 of 291 (Backbone Def.)g 176 of 707 (2.1) Not found

a Rank of best solution and total number of conformations obtained in this work; in parentheses: r.m.s.d. (Å) calculated for the ligand interface Cα atoms of the best solution when only the receptor Cα atoms are superimposed onto the equivalent atoms of the real structure.

b This is not a comparison between different docking methods, but rather a compilation of the results. The receptor coverage/restraints differ between the algorithms, so a direct comparison between the results could be misleading.

c Global docking followed by hydrophobicity and connectivity filters (Norel et al. 1999); r.m.s.d. (Å) calculated for ligand heavy atoms when only receptor is superimposed onto the real structure.

d Global docking and filtering with distance restraints (Gabb et al. 1997); r.m.s.d. (Å) calculated for all Cα atoms when both receptor and ligand Cα atoms are superimposed onto the real complex.

e Global docking, filtering with distance restraints and refinement with solvation (Jackson et al. 1998); r.m.s.d. (Å) calculated for all Cα atoms when both receptor and ligand Cα atoms are superimposed onto the real complex.

f Global docking (Palma et al. 2000); r.m.s.d. (Å) calculated for the ligand Cα atoms when only the receptor Cα atoms are superimposed onto the real structure.

g Ligand backbone deformation upon binding (r.m.s.d. of the unbound ligand backbone atoms in the interface >1.8 Å from the complexed ligand structure).

h No coordinates deposited in PDB: the structures were kindly provided by the authors (Strynadka et al. 1992, 1994, 1996b).