Skip to main content
. 2002 Feb;11(2):430–448. doi: 10.1002/pro.110430

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Performance of the distance-dependent potential as a function of its range. The percentage of the correctly predicted cases for the optimal Z-score cutoff (Materials and Methods). The performance is shown separately for the four sets with 100 good and 100 bad test models each (100/100 sets) (Materials and Methods): The very small models (▪), the small models (○), the medium size models (•), and the large models (□). The performance on the 400/400 test model set is indicated by the broken line. The potentials were calculated as specified in Table 1, except for the varying distance range.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure