Skip to main content
. 2002 Apr;11(4):894–902. doi: 10.1110/ps.4360102

Table 1.

Effect of the sulfhydryl reagent MTSES on leukocidin pores with cysteine-substituted subunits: single-channel and macroscopic currents

Pore LukF-S124C/WT LukS WT LukF/LukS-A122C
Isa 145 ± 6 154 ± 6
ΔIs(1)b 3.0 ± 0.7 2.8 ± 0.6
ΔIs(2)b 3.3 ± 0.5 3.1 ± 0.5
ΔIs(3)b 3.7 ± 0.4 3.5 ± 0.4
ΔIs(4)b 4.3 ± 0.6 4.0 ± 0.5
ΔIs*(4)c 4.4 ± 0.6 4.1 ± 0.6
ΔIs*(3)c 3.7 ± 0.3 3.3 ± 0.5
ΔIs*(2)c 3.2 ± 0.5 3.2 ± 0.4
ΔIs*(1)c 3.1 ± 0.8 2.8 ± 0.5
ΣΔIs/Isd 10 ± 1 8.8 ± 0.6
ΔIm/Ime 9.9 ± 1.2 8.5 ± 0.7

a Mean single-channel current in pA (± SD) at −60 mV.

b Mean blockade in pA (± SD) after each modification step with MTSES. The numbering of the four steps is the same as shown in Figure 3. All experiments showed four steps except one with Luk F-S124C/WT LukS, in which three steps were seen in 1 of 12 experiments. In the latter experiment, three steps were also seen during the reversal by DTT. For wild-type LukF/LukS-A122C, 9 experiments were done.

c Mean increase in current in pA (± SD) after each reversal step by DTT. The numbering of the four steps is the same as shown in Figure 3.

d Mean total extent of blockade (% ± SD) in the single-channel experiments after completion of the reaction with MTSES.

e Mean total extent of blockade (% ± SD) in the macroscopic current experiments after completion of the reaction with MTSES (for details, see Figure 4).