Table 3.
The enthalpy changes of the interaction of E3 and E1 with PSBD in different buffers at different pH values
| E3 | E1 | ||||
| pH | Buffer | ΔH°obs (kcal/mol) | Protons linkeda (n) | ΔH°obs (kcal/mol) | Protons linkeda (n) |
| 5.5 | cacodylate | 3.9 | −1.14 ± 0.14 | −7.5 | −0.64 ± 0.21 |
| MES | −1.8 | −11.5 | |||
| Bistris | −4.3 | −12.0 | |||
| 6.5 | cacodylate | 2.9 | −0.36 ± 0.04 | −9.2 | 0.1 ± 0.01 |
| MES | 1.6 | −8.8 | |||
| Aces | 0 | −8.4 | |||
| 7.4 | cacodylate | 2.0 | −0.02 ± 0.05 | −9.4 | 0.11 ± 0.08 |
| MES | 1.6 | −8.2 | |||
| Hepes | 2.1 | −8.5 | |||
| Aces | 1.8 | −8.6 | |||
| 8.5 | Hepes | 1.9 | 0.08 ± 0.07 | −10.8 | −0.02 ± 0.18 |
| Tricine | 1.7 | −9.8 | |||
| Tris-HCl | 2.4 | −10.8 | |||
All experiments were repeated twice and the average values are listed. The buffer conditions were 20 mM buffer, 150 mM NaCl and 3.4 mM EDTA at 25°C.
a The number of protons exchanged upon binding was obtained from the slopes of plots of ΔHobs versus ΔHion in Figure 4 ▶.