Skip to main content
. 2002 Sep;11(9):2208–2217. doi: 10.1110/ps.0208002

Table 1.

Thermodynamic parameters of unfolding of native and chimeric class μ glutathione transferases

Fluorescencea CDb
Transition 1 Transition 2
Protein ΔG(H2O)1 (kcal • mol−1) m1 (kcal • mol−1 • M1) ΔG(H2O)2 (kcal • mol−1) m2 (kcal • mol−1 • M1) ΔG(H2O) (kcal • mol−1) m (kcal • mol−1 • M1)
M1–1c 10.8 ± 1.8 1.0 ± 0.2 16.5 ± 0.1 3.5 ± 0.3 19.6 ± 0.2 3.38 ± 0.02
M2–2c 12.4 ± 0.9 1.8 ± 0.1 14.8 ± 0.8 3.1 ± 1.1 17.1 ± 1.1 3.7 ± 0.03
M12–12 11.7 ± 0.8 1.0 ± 0.2 14.2 ± 1.9 3.1 ± 0.3 16.5 ± 0.4 3.5 ± 0.1
M21–21 10.2 ± 0.8 0.8 ± 0.2 11.8 ± 1.4 2.5 ± 0.2 9.9 ± 0.3 1.99 ± 0.05

a Fluorescence data were fitted to a three-state unfolding mechanism (N2 ↔ 2I ↔ 2U).

b The CD data were fit to a two-state mechanism.

c Data for the native enzymes are from Hornby et al. (2000).