Table 4.
Total tibial cartilage volume r2 values and p values for Δr2 for different linear regression models
Model for total tibial cartilage volume | r2 | p Value for Δ r2 compared with the specified model | ΔF with addition to the model (p value for ΔF is the same as for Δr2) |
Bone area only (+) | 0.14 | < 0.001 | N/A |
Bone area (+) age (-) | 0.21 | < 0.001 compared with bone area only | 14.84 |
Bone area (+) age (-) smoking, alcohol | 0.22 | 0.43 compared with bone area and age | 0.86 |
Bone area (+) age (-) smoking, alcohol, BMI | 0.22 | 0.53 compared with bone area, age, smoking and alcohol | 0.39 |
Bone area (+) age (-) smoking, alcohol, ln hsCRP (-) | 0.28 | < 0.001 compared with bone area, age, smoking, alcohol | 13.15 |
Bone area (+) age (-) smoking, alcohol, BMI ln hsCRP(-) | 0.28 | < 0.001 compared with bone area age smoking alcohol | 7.23 (both variables added together); if BMI added first, ΔF = 0.43 (p for ΔF = 0.51) followed by lnCRP ΔF = 13.99, (p for ΔF < 0.001); if ln CRP added first, ΔF = 13.15, (p for ΔF < 0.001) followed by BMI ΔF = 1.28, (p for ΔF = 0.26) |
Parenthesis indicate the sign of regression coefficients statistically significant at the 5% level. BMI, body mass index (kg/m2); ln hsCRP, natural log high sensitivity C-reactive protein.