Skip to main content
. 2008 Feb 1;103(2):181–188. doi: 10.1007/s00421-008-0684-z

Table 3.

Regression models for aerobic capacity

Independent variables Aerobic capacity (peakVO2, in l/min)
β P-value R2
Simple regression analysis
 Personal characteristics
 Gender 0.61 <0.001 0.36
 Age −0.07 0.65
 Lesion level −0.43 0.002 0.17
 Hydrocephalus −0.18 0.22
 Ambulatory status −0.48 <0.001 0.22
 Educational level 0.13 0.39
Multiple regression analysis
 Step 1a
  Personal characteristics 0.50
  Gender −0.55 <0.001
  Ambulatory status −0.40 <0.001
 Step 2b
  Inter-relations
  Muscle strength (Z-score) 0.22 0.04 0.55
  Body composition (sum of four skin-folds in mm) 0.25 0.08 0.53
  Joint mobility (number of restricted joints) 0.00 0.98

Significant betas are presented in bold

β standardized regression coefficient, R2 explained variance, Gender male (0), female (1), Lesion level sacral (1), lumbosacral (2), lumbar (3), thoracolumbar (4), thoracic (5), Hydrocephalus no (0), yes (1), Ambulatory status community ambulator (1), household ambulator (2), non(functional) ambulator (3), Educational level: low (0), medium (1), high (2)

aDue to large overlap between ambulatory status and lesion level, we only included ambulatory status

bRelations between aerobic capacity and other fitness components controlled for gender and ambulatory status