Table 3.
Independent variables | Aerobic capacity (peakVO2, in l/min) | ||
---|---|---|---|
β | P-value | R2 | |
Simple regression analysis | |||
Personal characteristics | |||
Gender | −0.61 | <0.001 | 0.36 |
Age | −0.07 | 0.65 | – |
Lesion level | −0.43 | 0.002 | 0.17 |
Hydrocephalus | −0.18 | 0.22 | – |
Ambulatory status | −0.48 | <0.001 | 0.22 |
Educational level | 0.13 | 0.39 | – |
Multiple regression analysis | |||
Step 1a | |||
Personal characteristics | 0.50 | ||
Gender | −0.55 | <0.001 | |
Ambulatory status | −0.40 | <0.001 | |
Step 2b | |||
Inter-relations | |||
Muscle strength (Z-score) | 0.22 | 0.04 | 0.55 |
Body composition (sum of four skin-folds in mm) | 0.25 | 0.08 | 0.53 |
Joint mobility (number of restricted joints) | 0.00 | 0.98 | – |
Significant betas are presented in bold
β standardized regression coefficient, R2 explained variance, Gender male (0), female (1), Lesion level sacral (1), lumbosacral (2), lumbar (3), thoracolumbar (4), thoracic (5), Hydrocephalus no (0), yes (1), Ambulatory status community ambulator (1), household ambulator (2), non(functional) ambulator (3), Educational level: low (0), medium (1), high (2)
aDue to large overlap between ambulatory status and lesion level, we only included ambulatory status
bRelations between aerobic capacity and other fitness components controlled for gender and ambulatory status