Skip to main content
. 2007 Aug 29;8(8):R178. doi: 10.1186/gb-2007-8-8-r178

Table 1.

Comparison of MA2C with other algorithms using a spike-in experiment with a total of 96 regions and 47 unique non-overlapping regions

Algorithm CHIP_ID PPV Sensitivity Unique Correlation
ChIPOTle 49875 71% 85% 40 0.72
49880 69% 98% 47 0.76
49883 73% 98% 47 0.79
MPeak 49875 100% 91% 46 0.74
49880 96% 89% 46 0.71
49883 98% 89% 46 0.79
MA2C 49875 99% 91% 47 0.78
(C = 2 normalized) 49880 96% 94% 47 0.79
49883 99% 95% 47 0.81
All 3 96% 96% 47 0.81
MA2C 49875 99% 92% 46 0.77
(Global median-scaled) 49880 100% 93% 46 0.79
49883 99% 92% 46 0.81
All 3 100% 95% 47 0.80

PPV (positive predictive value) = no. of true positive peaks/no. of total peaks. Sensitivity = no. of detected true positive regions/96. Unique = number of unique regions found. Correlation = correlation coefficient of the spike-in log fold-changes and algorithm-assigned scores for the 47 unique regions.