Skip to main content
. 2007 Oct 25;585(Pt 3):881–895. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.145003

Figure 5. eIPSCF and eIPSCS display different paired-pulse plasticity.

Figure 5

A, eIPSCs recorded at different holding potentials. Traces are an average of 10 trials. B, reversal potentials of eIPSCF (filled symbols) and eIPSCS (open symbols) do not differ. Experiments were performed using two intracellular solutions containing 50 and 15 mm Cl−. C, PPR as a function of eIPSC rise times. Data obtained from 75 CR cells. D, eIPSCF and eIPSCS differ in paired-pulse ratio both at room and near physiological temperatures. **P < 0.01.