Skip to main content
. 2007 Nov 29;586(Pt 4):1195–1205. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.144113

Table 4.

Forearm haemodynamics at rest and increasing exercise intensity during normoxia and hypoxia with each drug condition. Δ from normoxia rest: absolute change from normoxia rest within each drug infusion

Δ from normoxia rest

Rest 10% 20% 10% 20%
Forearm blood flow (ml min−1)
 Control
  Normoxia 62 ± 11 189 ± 23 350 ± 40 126 ± 16 287 ± 35
  Hypoxia* 76 ± 13 231 ± 39 409 ± 46 169 ± 30 346 ± 40
 Phentolamine
  Normoxia 224 ± 20 356 ± 31 502 ± 44 131 ± 21 286 ± 41
  Hypoxia* 378 ± 39 509 ± 46 669 ± 33 306 ± 43 466 ± 57
 Phentolamine/propranolol
  Normoxia 280 ± 40 420 ± 51 593 ± 61 139 ± 25 312 ± 45
  Hypoxia* 382 ± 46 494 ± 50 751 ± 42§ 213 ± 25§ 450 ± 43
Forearm vascular conductance (ml min−1 (100 mmHg)−1)
 Control
  Normoxia 73 ± 12 213 ± 26 387 ± 43 139 ± 18 314 ± 38
  Hypoxia* 89 ± 16 263 ± 43 450 ± 47 190 ± 32 377 ± 40
 Phentolamine
  Normoxia 265 ± 24 411 ± 36 570 ± 53 147 ± 25 315 ± 50
  Hypoxia* 448 ± 46 591 ± 55 759 ± 69 354 ± 53 521 ± 63
 Phentolamine/propranolol
  Normoxia 325 ± 47 477 ± 58 652 ± 65 152 ± 29 326 ± 51
  Hypoxia* 443 ± 55 565 ± 54 825 ± 52 240 ± 27§ 479 ± 53

Values are mean ±s.e.m.

*

Main effect of hypoxia, P < 0.05

main effect of exercise, P < 0.05

P < 0.05 vs. control

§

P < 0.05 vs. phentolamine.