Skip to main content
. 2007 Dec 6;586(Pt 4):951–963. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.143289

Table 4.

Thermodynamics of antagonist dissociation

25°C 37°C


Antagonist n l−1 (s−1) n l−1 (s−1) Q10 Ea (kJ mol−1) ΔH (kJ mol−1) ΔS (kJ mol−1 K−1) ΔG25°C (kJ mol−1) ΔG37°C (kJ mol−1)
(+)-Tubocurarine 8 6 ± 1 7 31 ± 8 4.0 ± 0.4 106 ± 8  104 ± 8  0.25 ± 0.3 29 ± 0.6 26 ± 0.6
Pancuronium 12 2 ± 1 6 13 ± 4 4.5 ± 0.6 116 ± 10 113 ± 10 0.27 ± 0.4 31 ± 0.7 28 ± 0.8
Cisatracurium 15 34 ± 6  5 139 ± 16 3.2 ± 0.2 90 ± 6 88 ± 6 0.21 ± 0.3 24 ± 0.5 22 ± 0.3

n, number of experiments; l−1, dissociation rate constant; other symbols as in Table 3. Data for (+)-tubocurarine, pancuronium and cisatracurium at 25°C were previously published (Demazumder & Dilger, 2001; Wenningmann & Dilger, 2001). l−1 values were significantly different among the antagonists at both temperatures (P < 0.0001). Q10, Ea and ΔH were the same for (+)-tubocurarine and pancuronium, but these values were significantly different from those for cisatracurium (P < 0.01); ΔG values at 25°C were significantly different from those at 37°C for all antagonists (P < 0.0001).