Skip to main content
. 2007 Nov;211(5):579–588. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2007.00811.x

Table 5.

Values of LD/WT ratio per generation

Subject 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Mean
Generation
0 14.27 11.77 11.64 12.29 13.12 12.59 14.98 15.08 13.21 15.94 13.49
1 11.76 9.70 9.36 9.30 11.28 10.86 9.43 9.42 10.67 10.91 10.27
2 8.07 7.32 7.51 6.52 8.01 9.16 8.67 7.40 8.08 7.84 7.86
3 5.46 5.09 5.17 4.77 5.43 4.99 6.38 4.72 5.33 5.83 5.32
4 4.10 3.71 3.93 4.06 4.60 4.25 4.81 3.69 3.80 4.84 4.18
5 3.29 2.93 3.15 3.49 3.79 3.34 3.59 2.86 3.15 3.92 3.35
6 3.05 2.50 2.56 2.84 3.20 3.26 2.93 2.37 2.88 3.34 2.89
7 3.05 2.37 2.50 2.65 3.07 3.10 2.50 2.31 2.69 3.22 2.75
8 3.09 2.36 2.36 2.53 3.03 3.26 2.30 2.34 2.74 3.07 2.71
9 2.79 2.33 2.54 2.69 2.86 3.18 2.28 2.19 2.98 3.14 2.70
10 2.76 2.24 2.62 2.60 2.96 3.14 2.41 2.24 2.72 3.43 2.71
11 2.29 2.58 2.63 2.75 3.24 2.23 3.48 2.74
12 2.35 2.53 2.48 2.78 2.77 2.12 3.66 2.67
13 2.74 4.03 2.25 3.02 3.01
14 2.35 2.35

For each subject, values are the LD/WT ratio values of each bronchus averaged over each generation (Weibel's model). Mean is the averaged value over subjects in each generation. No difference was found between subjects (Kruskall–Wallis test).