Skip to main content
Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association logoLink to Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association
. 1990;101:114–121.

The control of cell volume: frog eggs face an extreme challenge.

P T Macklem 1, S Kelly 1
PMCID: PMC2376484  PMID: 2486436

Full text

PDF
114

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Fein H. Microdimensional pressure measurements in electrolytes. J Appl Physiol. 1972 Apr;32(4):560–564. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1972.32.4.560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ford C. C., Gurdon J. B. A method for enucleating oocytes of Xenopus laevis. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1977 Feb;37(1):203–209. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Mild K. H., Lovtrup S., Bergfors T. On the mechanical properties of the vitelline membrane of the frog egg. J Exp Biol. 1974 Jun;60(3):807–820. doi: 10.1242/jeb.60.3.807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. RAND R. P., BURTON A. C. MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF THE RED CELL MEMBRANE. I. MEMBRANE STIFFNESS AND INTRACELLULAR PRESSURE. Biophys J. 1964 Mar;4:115–135. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3495(64)86773-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association are provided here courtesy of American Clinical and Climatological Association

RESOURCES