Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 May 12.
Published in final edited form as: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007 Nov;62(11):1237–1243. doi: 10.1093/gerona/62.11.1237

Table 4.

Total number of participants enrolled in trial (assigned in equal numbers to the physical activity and successful aging interventions) required to provide 80% and 90% power to detect intervention effects of 20%, 25%, and 30% over 4 years of follow-up.*

Outcome 80% Power
90% Power
Intervention Effect
Intervention Effect
20% 25% 30% 20% 25% 30%
400 meter walk
 Time until first failure 1669 1056 719 2234 1414 962
 Two successive failures 3453 2120 1403 4624 2839 1678

4 meter walk
 Time until first failure 5178 3134 2085 6934 4196 2792
 Two successive failures 16881 9650 6597 22603 12921 8833

SPPB
 Mean difference over follow-up 4673 2991 2077 6257 4105 2781

SRDS
 Mean difference over follow-up 14010 8967 6233 18760 12006 8338
*

Projections are based on simulations incorporating means and transition rates from Tables 2 and 3 for the successful aging group. As an examples, for a 20% intervention effect the 400 meter transition rates for the intervention group were calculated as 6.9% × 0.8 = 5.5%, 7.9% × 0.8 = 6.3%, and 33.3% × 1.2 = 40.0% and the mean changes in the SPPB for the intervention group were calculated as 0.589 × 1.2 = 0.707 and −0.168 × 0.8 = −0.134.