Skip to main content
. 2003 Sep 9;89(6):1022–1027. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601231

Table 3. Differences in oncologist- and patient-assessed performance status (PS) scores in relation to disease stage, type and sex of patient.

  Doctor-assessed PS score compared to patient assessed PS score
Group/subgroup (n) Under-rated (D<P) n (%) Agree (D=P) n (%) Over-rated (D>P) n (%)
All patients (101) 27 (27) 51 (50) 23 (23)
Females (29) 3 (10) 16 (55) 10 (35)
Males (72) 24 (33) 35 (49) 13 (18)
 
NSCLC
 Stage unknown (1) 1 (100)
 Stage I (18) 5 (28) 9 (50) 4 (22)
 Stage II (4) 1 (25) 3 (75)
 Stage III (39) 11 (28) 19 (49) 9 (23)
 Stage IV (19) 6 (32) 6 (32) 7 (36)
 
SCLC
 Limited (11) 1 (9) 8 (73) 2 (18)
 Extensive (6) 1 (17) 4 (66) 1 (17)

Stage of NSCLC was not associated with PS score, whether assessed by patient or oncologist (P=0.18). Although there was no statistical difference in PS scores between males and females (P=0.37), oncologists generally gave lower PS scores to female patients (P=0.04, marginally significant). D=doctor-assessed PS score; P=patient-assessed PS score; NSCLC=non-small-cell lung cancer; SCLC=small-cell lung cancer.