Table 2.
IMAGE | Mean adjustment of diamond on dark surround | Mean adjustment of diamond on light surround |
---|---|---|
61.3 ± 5.9 | 54.9 ± 4.0 | |
43.4 ± 5.9 | 42.8 ± 4.7 | |
52.6 ± 6.9 | 49.4 ± 5.2 | |
12.6 ± 4.5 | 8.3 ± 4.1 | |
19.2 ± 3.3 | 15.4 ± 3.2 | |
12.0 ± 2.6 | 8.8 ± 2.5 | |
65.5 ± 3.0 | 59.8 ± 4.9 | |
75.9 ± 1.4 | 73.8 ± 4.2 | |
82.1 ± 1.9 | 81.2 ± 3.7 | |
60.8 ± 3.2 | 66.4 ± 7.2 | |
27.1 ± 4.2 | 26.3 ± 5.8 | |
52.7 ± 6.2 | 47.3 ± 5.5 | |
32.0 ± 6.1 | 36.9 ± 4.7 | |
The results of these two procedures were in all cases similar. In control trials between these tasks, subjects were asked to adjust the diamonds in each of the scenes in the absence of any context. The result (not shown) indicated that subjects were able to do this with great accuracy (±3 gray scale units) and that their performance was consistent over the testing period.