Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2007 Sep 29;38(4):380–386. doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2007.09.008

Table 1.

Summary of cDNA libraries and the results of expressed sequence tag (EST) analysis.

Name Tissue source # Original primary clones Fold-reduction in normalization Average insert size Total # sequences 1 Total # clones1 # Unique clones (%) #UniESTs (%)2 %Specific uniESTs % of ESTs matching genome3
TH1 Hindgut and Malpighian tubules ~107 NA nd 23,236 14,654 5,537 (38%) 2,904 (20%) 24% 97
TL1 Mixed larval stages ~107 NA nd 20,120 13,085 3,559 (27%) 1,600 (12%) 13% 93
TL2 Normalized TL1 NA Beta-actin 36x 1.5kb 1,708 1,050 640 (61%) 143 (14%) 1% 98
TF1 Fatbody full-length, normalized 3.8 × 107 EF1 alpha 93x 2.4kb 2,270 1,818 879 (45%) 309 (17%) 3% 98
TO1 Ovary normalized 5 × 106 EF1 alpha 11.7x 2.0kb 1,742 1,082 727 (67%) 323 (30%) 2% 67
TB1 Head (Brain) normalized 3.6 × 106 EF1 alpha 12x 1.3kb 1,448 855 633 (74%) 251 (30%) 2% 94
TE Embryo Downloaded from NCBI 2,519 2,519 1,823 (72%) 1,204 (48%) 10% 60
EX4 Mixed stages Downloaded from NCBI 8,185 8,185 4,379 (54%) 2,121 (13%) 17% 95
total 61,228 43,248 12,351 72%5 92
1

~70% of the clones were sequenced from both ends.

2

Expressed as a percentage of the total number of clones sequenced from the library.

3

E-value lower than 1E-50 in the BLAST search.

4

Refers to the Exelixis library (see Materials & Methods).

5

Remaining 28% of ESTs were redundant in multiple libraries.