Table 2.
Genome |
Glimmer3 Predictions |
versus Glimmer2.13 |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Organism | GC% | # Genes | 3′ Matches | 5′ & 3′ Matches | Extra | 3′ Match | 5′ & 3′ | Extra | ||
A.fulgidus | 49 | 1165 | 1162 | 99.7% | 841 | 72.2% | 1308 | −2 | −67 | −59 |
B.anthracis | 35 | 3132 | 3119 | 99.6% | 2717 | 86.7% | 2345 | +6 | +726 | −77 |
B.subtilis | 44 | 1576 | 1559 | 98.9% | 1379 | 87.5% | 2886 | +11 | +413 | −539 |
C.tepidum | 57 | 1292 | 1284 | 99.4% | 867 | 67.1% | 778 | +2 | −33 | −190 |
C.perfringens | 29 | 1504 | 1501 | 99.8% | 1360 | 90.4% | 1177 | −1 | +244 | −28 |
E.coli | 51 | 3603 | 3525 | 97.8% | 3014 | 83.7% | 942 | +16 | +693 | −632 |
G.sulfurreducens | 61 | 2351 | 2320 | 98.7% | 1883 | 80.1% | 1107 | +15 | +541 | −380 |
H.pylori | 39 | 915 | 908 | 99.2% | 785 | 85.8% | 774 | +1 | +46 | −94 |
P.fluorescens | 63 | 4535 | 4484 | 98.9% | 3412 | 75.2% | 1896 | +14 | +731 | −704 |
R.solanacearum | 67 | 2512 | 2468 | 98.2% | 1922 | 76.5% | 1091 | +72 | +646 | −326 |
S.epidermidis | 32 | 1650 | 1646 | 99.8% | 1496 | 90.7% | 767 | +3 | +338 | −66 |
T.pallidum | 53 | 575 | 569 | 99.0% | 397 | 69.0% | 568 | +3 | +55 | −296 |
U.parvum | 26 | 327 | 325 | 99.4% | 292 | 89.3% | 297 | 0 | +19 | −17 |
Averages: | 99.1% | 81.1% | +11 | +335 | −262 |
For each genome, ‘#Genes’ counts genes in the NCBI annotation that are at least 90bp long, do not have frame shifts or internal stop codons, and whose function description does not contain the string ‘hypothetical’. Both Glimmer3 and Glimmer2 were run with the same options and training/test sets in an 8-way cross-validation experiment on this set of genes. A prediction is a 3′ match iff it has the same reading frame and stop codon as a gene. 5′ & 3′ matches are predictions with the same start and stop codon as the annotation. Extra predictions are those that are not matches. The ‘versus Glimmer2’ column is the Glimmer3 value minus the corresponding Glimmer2 value.