Table 3.
Comparison of HDL, LDL and VLDL among conventional PT exercise, Hathayoga exercise and control type 2 diabetic patients over a 6-month period
| Variable/Group | Baseline | 3 Months | 6 Months |
| HDL (mmol/L) | |||
| Conventional PT | 0.93 ± 0.04 | 0.94 ± 0.04 | 0.94 ± 0.04 |
| Hatha yoga | 0.94 ± 0.04 | 0.97 ± 0.04 | 0.97 ± 0.05 |
| Control | 0.93 ± 0.93 | 0.93 ± 0.04 | 0.91 ± 0.04 |
| LDL (mmol/L) | |||
| Conventional PT | 3.02 ± 0.12 | 3.00 ± 0.12 | 3.00 ± 0.12 |
| Hatha yoga | 3.09 ± 0.14 | 3.01 ± 0.15 | 3.01 ± 0.14 |
| Control | 3.07 ± 0.12 | 3.17 ± 0.13 | 3.24 ± 0.12 |
| VLDL (mmol/L) | |||
| Conventional PT | 0.83 ± 0.05 | 0.78 ± 0.05 | 0.77 ± 0.05*a |
| Hatha yoga | 0.83 ± 0.07 | 0.79 ± 0.07 | 0.77 ± 0.07*a |
| Control | 0.84 ± 0.06 | 0.84 ± 0.06 | 0.84 ± 0.06 |
Values represent Mean ± S.E. *p < 0.05; a: statistically significant different from baseline.