Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Sci Res. 2008 Mar;37(1):109–137. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2007.07.003

Table 4.

Effects of Assimilation for Cubans

High School Graduationa
College Enrollmenta
Academic Achievementb
Self- Esteemb
Depressionb
Delinquencyb
Violenceb
Controlled Substance Useb
Sexual Intercourseb,d
Assimilation Measure
 Length of Stay 0.036 0.041 0.013 -0.008 0.010 0.071 ** 0.022 0.040 1.060 ***
 Length of Stay > 5 years 0.227 -0.060 0.069 0.019 -0.579 0.722 * 0.149 4.889 * 1.290
 U.S.- Born -0.135 -0.745 * -0.206 -0.118 -0.273 -0.057 0.116 1.922 0.996
 % U.S.-Born in Neighborhood -0.032 -0.098 0.052 * -0.009 -0.189 0.056 0.064 -0.070 1.006
 % U.S.-Born > 70% -0.271 -0.984 * 0.379 * -0.114 -1.154 0.331 0.187 -1.976 0.831
 % Non-Co-Ethnics in Neighborhood -0.033 -0.070 0.045 * -0.016 -0.147 0.076 0.075 0.155 1.005
 % Non-Co-Ethnics> 60% -0.043 -0.425 0.360 * -0.108 -1.044 0.685 0.627 1.008 0.968
 English language use in home -0.343 -0.114 0.241 -0.187 0.759 0.080 -0.068 2.529 1.458 *
 Proportion of non-coethnic friends 0.262 -0.449 0.044 -0.218 -0.977 0.090 0.049 0.306 1.436

Statistical Significance:

*

p<.10

**

p< .05

***

p<.01

Notes:

a)

Wave 3 data. N = 312

b)

Wave 1 data. N = 453

c)

Models control for specific ethnicity, age, sex, family income, parental education, neighborhood poverty rate, and family structure. Models using assimilation measures other than length of stay and generation also control for length of stay and generation.

d)

Hazard ratio of intitiating sexual intercourse.

Highlighting indicates a beneficial effect of assimilation that is statistically significant at the .05 level

Underlining indicates a detrimental effect of assimilation that is statistically significant at the .05 level