Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Pain Symptom Manage. 2008 Mar 4;35(4):412–419. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.06.010

Table 3.

Incidence of Respiratory Depression with Epidural Analgesia – Adult Data

Study, Year, Ref #(n) Study Design Epidural Opioid Incidence of Respiratory Depression Criteria
Wheatley, 2001(1) (1014 – > 1.3 million) Review of RCTs various 0.24–1.6% Various
Wheeler, 2002(19) (1596) Review of RCTs various E: 1.9%
IV PCA: 1.8%
IV/IM: 2.4%
Various
Fischer, 1988 (37) (107) Prospective morphine fentanyl 0% “Clinically evident”
Ready, 1991(9) (1106) Prospective morphine 0.2% Naloxone use
Stuart-Taylor, 1992(13) (800) Prospective diamorphine 0.9% RR < 10/min
de Leon-Casasola, 1994a (4) (4227) Prospective morphine 0.07% RR < 10/min prompted use of naloxone per protocol.
Scott, 1995(11)(1014) Prospective fentanyl RR<8/min: 1.2%,
Naloxone: 0.4%
RR < 8 Naloxone use
Rygnestad, 1997 (10) (2000) Prospective morphine Overall: 1.6%
Severe: 0.15%
Considered severe if infusion was stopped.
Liu, 1998b (8)(1030) Prospective fentanyl 0.3% RR < 8/min
Flisberg, 2003(5) (2696) Prospective morphine IV PCA: 1.2%
PCEA: 0.4%
RR < 8/min
Shapiro, 2005(12) (1524) Prospective morphine Overall: 1.2%
IV PCA: 1.9%
E: 0.6%
IT: 0.7%
RR < 10/min
Burstal, 1998(38) (1062) Prospective survey various 0.32% RR < 8 and sedation
Fuller, 1990(6) (4880) Retrospective morphine 0.25% RR < 10/min
Tsui, 1997(14) (1466) Retrospective morphine fentanyl IV PCA: 1.97%
E: 0.6%
RR < 10/min
SpO2 < 90%
PCO2 > 7kPa
Wigfull, 2001b (16) (1057) Retrospective fentanyl 0.19% RR < 8/min

RCT = randomized controlled trial; E = epidural; IV = intravenous; PCA = patient controlled analgesia; IM = intramuscular; RR = respiratory rate; PCEA = patient controlled epidural analgesia; IT = intrathecal; SpO2 = arterial oxygen saturation; pCO2 = arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure.

a

Used intravenous morphine as supplementary analgesia.

b

Used patient-controlled epidural analgesia.

AU: PLS CHECK SUPERSCRIPTS AS THEY HAD TO BE CHANGED TO CONFORM TO JOURNAL STYLE. ALSO, IS THE ADDITION OF REF # TO COLUMN 1 OKAY WITH YOU?