Skip to main content
. 2008 Mar;3(2):457–462. doi: 10.2215/CJN.03020707

Table 3.

Hemoglobin (g/dl) versus GFR (ml/min per 1.73 m2) and covariates in a threshold regression model

Parameter Parameter Estimates (95% CI)
Unadjusted(n = 340) Age/Gender Adjusted(n = 340) Fully Adjusted(n = 339)
GFR threshold, c (ml/min per 1.73 m2) 43 (28 to 52) 43 (29 to 51) 43 (NA)a
Y-intercept, mean hemoglobin at GFR threshold, c (g/dl) 12.6 (12.3 to 12.9) 12.6 (12.3 to 13.0) 12.7 (12.5 to 13.1)
Parameter
GFR ≤c, per 5-ml/min per 1.73 m2 decrease −0.3 (−0.5 to −0.2) −0.4 (−0.5 to −0.2) −0.3 (−0.5 to −0.2)
GFR >c, per 5-ml/min per 1.73 m2 decrease −0.1 (−0.2 to 0.0) −0.1 (−0.2 to 0.0) −0.1 (−0.2 to 0.0)
Female gender −0.1 (−0.5 to 0.2) 0.0 (−0.4 to 0.3)
Age, per 5-yr increase 0.1 (−0.1 to 0.3) 0.2 (0.0 to 0.4)
Black versus nonblack race −0.1 (−0.6 to 0.3)
Glomerular versus nonglomerular CKD −0.9 (−1.3 to −0.5)
a

95% CI was not attainable (NA): The lower bound was less than a GFR of 20 ml/min per 1.73 m2, and the upper bound was >60 ml/min per 1.73 m2, the bounds of the search for threshold, c, using profile likelihood.