Skip to main content
. 2008 Jan;3(1):117–124. doi: 10.2215/CJN.02790707

Table 5.

Patterns of immunosuppression claims in patients with discordant indications of calcineurin inhibitor and antimetabolite use in claims compared with OPTN and the MRa

Parameter Discharge (n [%])
6 Mo (n [%])
1 Yr (n [%])
All Study Time Points (n [%])
OPTNb MRb OPTNb MRb OPTNb MRb OPTNb MRb Total
Total discordant 37 (100) 7 (100) 20 (100) 25 (100) 14 (100) 12 (100) 71 (100) 44 (100) 115 (100)
Concordant claim present within an extended window of ±90 d 7 (18.9) 4 (57.1) 8 (40.0) 12 (48.0) 5 (35.7) 6 (50) 20 (28.2) 22 (50.0) 42 (36.5)
Claim for another drug of same class at corresponding observation timec 21 (56.8) 1 (14.3) 6 (30.0) 6 (24.0) 2 (14.3) 1 (8.3) 29 (40.8) 8 (18.2) 37 (32.2)
No claim for any drug within class at corresponding observation timec 9 (24.3) 2 (28.6) 6 (30.0) 7 (28.0) 7 (50.0) 5 (41.7) 22 (31.0) 14 (31.8) 36 (31.3)
a

Calcineurin inhibitor class comprises cyclosporine and tacrolimus. Antimetabolite class comprises azathioprine and MMF.

b

Data source compared with claims.

c

The window for claims ascertainment taken as ±30 d of the corresponding follow-up date, as per definition in primary analyses.