Skip to main content
. 2008 May 1;9:226. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-226

Table 5.

Comparisons of accuracies obtained by PFRES, PFP and coupled PFRES+SCPRED and PFP+SCPRED methods on FC699 dataset.

Entire FC699 dataset Only kept sequences Only removed sequences
PFRES SCPRED PFRES + SCPRED Coverage (% kept)

fold class class fold class fold class
65.6 92.1 87.5 68.6 96.7 45.7 62.8 86.6%

PFP SCPRED PFP + SCPRED Coverage (% kept)

fold class class fold class fold class
30.9 65.8 87.5 47.3 97.0 3.8 14.1 62.4%

The "Entire FC699 dataset" column shows accuracies for PFRES, SCPRED and PFP methods for class/fold prediction on the FC699 dataset. The "Only kept sequences" column show accuracies obtained by the PFRES and PFP methods for sequences for which SCPRED predicted the same structural class as PFRES and PFP, respectively. The "Only removed sequences" column show accuracies obtained by the PFRES and PFP methods for sequences for which SCPRED predicted different structural class when compared with predictions of PFRES and PFP, respectively. The "Coverage" column shows the percentage of sequences for which the SCPRED and PFRES/PFP predicted the same structural class.