Skip to main content
. 2007 Jul 24;3(5):509–512. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2007.0307

Table 1.

Sensitivity analyses of parsimony network results for two cowrie genera in which errors can (Palmadusta) or cannot (Cribrarula) be reduced to zero by choosing a probability of parsimony different from the default value of 0.95 (bold); and summed across 15 well-sampled genera (Bistolida, Cribrarula, Cypraeovula, Erosaria, Erronea, Leporicypraea, Luria, Lyncina, Mauritia, Monetaria, Notadusta, Ovatipsa, Palmadusta, Pustularia and Zoila) that included one or more false-negative ESUs or false-positive subnetworks. (No errors were found in four additional genera (Cypraea, Notocypraea, Talostolida and Purpuradusta). Adapted from Meyer & Paulay (2005).)

group probability of parsimony

0.90 0.91 0.92 0.93 0.94 0.95 0.96 0.97 0.98 0.99
Palmadusta (16 ESUs)
 false negatives 5 5 5 4 3 2 1 0 0 0
 false positives 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8
 total errors 5 5 5 4 3 2 1 0 0 8
Cribrarula (18 ESUs)
 false negatives 9 7 7 6 6 5 5 5 3 3
 false positives 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
 total errors 9 7 7 6 6 5 5 5 3 6
15 genera (178 ESUs)
 false negatives 55 50 50 46 42 35 31 29 25 20
 false positives 2 2 2 2 3 3 4 6 14 54
 total errors 57 52 52 48 45 38 35 35 39 74