Skip to main content
. 2008 Mar 3;105(11):4519–4523. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0710811105

Table 1.

Stand-level comparisons of 3D vegetation density between native- and invasive-dominated forests

Forest stand Cumulative area, ha Canopy Midlevel Understory
Montane forest
    F. uhdei 60.2 81.9 ± 5.4* 8.3 ± 0.5* 5.9 ± 2.7*
    Native 60.7 62.4 ± 3.4 26.5 ± 1.9 11.4 ± 1.6
Submontane forest
    M. faya 97.2 95.2 ± 13.1* 4.8 ± 2.2*
    Native 94.3 62.5 ± 7.6 25.0 ± 2.8 12.5 ± 6.0
Submontane forest
    H. gardnerianum 61.1 51.9 ± 6.5* 9.6 ± 1.1* 38.5 ± 5.0*
    Native 63.8 60.5 ± 5.8* 27.6 ± 2.7 11.9 ± 4.0
Lowland forest
    F. moluccana 51.9 78.5 ± 4.9* 13.0 ± 0.5* 8.5 ± 0.8*
    Native 48.8 50.5 ± 3.8 37.6 ± 2.7 11.9 ± 3.0
Lowland forest
    P. cattleianum 79.7 17.5 ± 2.0* 78.3 ± 9.3* 4.2 ± 0.5*
    Native 80.8 55.0 ± 4.2 29.3 ± 0.8 10.1 ± 3.0

Values are the mean (± SE) percentages of total forest canopy volume defined by the number of airborne laser returns. Symbols indicate differences at each vertical stratum in the forest canopy (t tests, P < 0.05). Dash (—) indicates foliage densities <1%.