Table 6. Relationships between leadership and team effectiveness.
Leadership variable | Dependent variable | β | P |
---|---|---|---|
Having a number of leaders | Participation | 0.305 | 0.016 |
Focus on quality | 0.374 | 0.012 | |
Reflexivity | 0.420 | 0.005 | |
Innovation (self-rated) | 0.224 | 0.041 | |
Effectiveness (overall) | 0.258 | 0.018 | |
Lack of clarity over leadership | Participation | −0.470 | <0.001 |
Support for innovation | −0.538 | <0.001 | |
Mean TCI score | −0.573 | <0.001 | |
Clarity of objectives | −0.430 | 0.004 | |
Innovation (self-rated) | −0.392 | 0.001 | |
Effectiveness (overall) | −0.382 | 0.001 | |
Effectiveness – audit/research | −0.511 | <0.001 | |
Efficient use of resources | −0.480 | <0.001 | |
Effective comm. with patients | −0.296 | 0.012 | |
Effective internal comm. | −0.431 | <0.001 | |
Conflict over leadership | Participation | −0.312 | 0.014 |
Support for innovation | −0.515 | <0.001 | |
Mean TCI score | −0.453 | 0.001 | |
Effectiveness – audit/research | −0.287 | 0.007 | |
Effective internal comm. | −0.367 | 0.001 | |
Having a single, clear leader | Support for innovation | −0.414 | 0.002 |
Mean TCI score | −0.384 | 0.004 | |
Effectiveness – audit/research | −0.353 | 0.002 |
β=standardised coefficient in the regression equation; P=statistical significance; TCI=Team Climate Inventory.