Skip to main content
. 2003 Jul 1;89(1):55–64. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601095

Table 3. Meta-analysis of the subgroup including studies of stages I and II NSCLC with their characteristics.

Group of NSCLC: stages I–II (n=8)
Study Method Threshold QS (%) N Pts Bcl-2+ (%) HR 95% CI
Apolinario et al (1997) IHC-clone 100 NM 59 73 51 0.40 0.16–0.98
Chen et al (1999) IHC-clone 124 NM 33 40 43 0.18 0.04–0.88
D'Amico et al (1999) IHC-clone 120 >50 72 408 23 0.88 0.60–1.28
Higashiyama et al (1997) IHC-clone 124 >10 52 38 39 0.30 0.06–1.62
Koukourakis et al (1997) IHC-clone 100 NM 58 107 19 0.32 0.13–0.86
Ohsaki et al (1996) IHC-clone 124 >20 50 45 29 0.45 0.13–1.56
Pastorino et al (1997) IHC-clone 120 >10 76 485 17 0.89 0.65–1.21
Pezzella et al (1993) IHC-clone 100 NM 65 115 22 0.54 0.29–1.03
               
Overall (fixed-effects model)   1311 23 0.70 0.57–0.86
Overall (random-effects model)       0.59 0.42–0.83
χ2 statistic for heterogeneity=12.80, 7 df, P=0.08

IHC-clone 100=immunohistochemistry with monoclonal antibody 100; IHC-clone 124=immunohistochemistry with monoclonal antibody 124; QS=Median quality score; N pts=number of patients; Bcl-2+=presence of Bcl-2; df=degree of freedom; HR=hazard ratio; CI=confidence interval; NM=not clearly mentioned.