Skip to main content
. 2003 Oct 14;89(8):1405–1408. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601308

Table 1. Study set characteristics and conclusions.

Characteristic Sponsorship industry (n=44) Sponsorship nonprofit (n=106) P-value
Analysis type
 Cost minimisation 17 16  
 Cost effectiveness 19 76 0.004
 Cost utility 6 12  
 Cost–benefit 2 2  
       
Technology assessed
 Pharmaceuticals 36 25  
 Surgery 3 15  
 Screening 1 42  
 Diagnostics 3 18 <0.0001
 Devices 1 2  
 Supportive care 0 3  
 Pharmacokinetic monitoring 0 1  
       
Publication status
 Non-peer reviewed 8 8 0.08
 Peer reviewed 36 98  
       
Sensitivity tested      
 Yes 26 52 0.29
 No 18 54  
       
Qualitative conclusions about costs
 Positive 27 35  
 Negative 7 16 0.002
 Neutral 10 55