Skip to main content
. 2003 Jul 29;89(3):519–523. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601140

Table 1. Details of the 14 studies included in the meta-analysis.

Study first author Year (Country) Study design Period of diagnosis Time of weight estimate   Number of
  Adjustments
        Sex Cases Controls Proxies Smoking Diabetes
Bueno de Mesquita 1990 (Netherlands) C–C 1984–1988 2 years before interview M 90 232 Yes Yes No
        F 74 248      
Howe 1990 (Canada) C–C 1983–1986 2 years before interview M 141 270 Yes No No
        F 108 235      
Ghadirian 1991 (Canada) C–C 1984–1988 2 years before interview M, F 179 239 Yes Yes No
Zatonski 1991 (Poland) C–C 1985–1988 Not known M, F 110 195 Yes No No
Friedman 1993 (USA) Cohort 1945–1988 Prospective (measured) M, F 450 2687 NA Yes No
Shibata 1994 (USA) Cohort 1981–1990 Prospective M, F 65 NA NA Yes No
Silverman 1998 (USA) C–C 1986–1989 Usual in adulthood M 218 1231 No Yes Yes
        F 213 747      
Gapstur 2000 (USA) Cohort 1967–1995 Prospective (measured) M 96 NA NA Yes Yes
        F 43 NA      
Michaud 2001 (USA) Cohort 1976–1998 Prospective M 140 NA NA Yes Yes
        F 210 NA      
Hanley 2001 (Canada) C–C 1994–1997 2 years before interview M 173 1074 No Yes No
        F 139 1191      
Stolzenberg-Solomon 2002 (Finland) Cohort 1985–1997 Prospective (measured) M 172 NA NA NA Yes
Lee 2003 (USA) Cohort 1962–1995 Prospective M, F 212 NA NA NA Yes
Calle 2003 (USA) Cohort 1982–1998 Prospective M 1908 NA NA Yes No
        F 1650 NA      

NA=not applicable; C–C=case–control study; M=males; F=females.

Michaud (2001) published the results of two cohort studies in one paper. The male subjects were one cohort study (Health Professionals' Follow-up study) and the female subjects were the other (Nurses' Health Study).