Skip to main content
. 2003 Aug 26;89(5):891–898. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601194

Table 1. Clinical and histopathological details for patient samples used in the study.

Patient Histology Age Status FIGO stage Grade LVS involved Tamoxifen use
1 Benign 51 Alive N
2 Benign 57 Alive N
3 Benign 80 Alive N
4 Benign 63 Alive N
5 Benign 68 Alive N
6 ACH 56 Alive N
7 ACH 58 Alive N
8 ACH 52 Alive N
9 ACH 69 Alive N
10 ACH 52 Alive N
11 Endometrioid cancer 41 Alive 1C 1 N N
12 Endometrioid cancer 56 Alive 2B 2 N/R N
13 Endometrioid cancer 48 Alive 2B 2 Y N
14 Endometrioid cancer 46 Alive 1B 2 N N
15 Endometrioid cancer 71 Alive 3A 3 N/R N
16 Endometrioid cancer 87 Alive 1B 3 N N
17 Endometrioid cancer 54 Alive 1B 3 N Y
18 Endometrioid cancer 78 Deceased 1C 3 N N
19 Endometrioid cancer 84 Deceased 4A 3 Y N
20 Endometrioid cancer 56 Alive 3B 3 N/R N
21 Endometrioid cancer 52 Alive 1B 3 N/R Y
22 Endometrioid cancer 68 Deceased 4A 3 Y Y
23 Endometrioid cancer 81 Alive 1B 3 Y N

ACH=atypical complex hyperplasia; LVS=lymphovascular space involvement N/R=not reported N=never, Y=yes.