Skip to main content
. 2008 May 9;7:80. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-7-80

Table 2.

Follow-up of former participants and comparison with matched controls.

Former participants Matched colleagues
Responses 41/60 (68%) 19
Speciality:
 Doctor 46.3% (19/41) 53.6% (10/19)
 Entomologist 12.2% (5/41) 15.8% (3/19)
 Participant researcher 14.6% (5/41) 15.8% (3/19)
 Pharmacist 7.3% (3/41)
 Specialist technician 4.9% (2/41) 5.3% (1/19)
 Lecturer-researcher 4.9% (2/41)
 Other 9.8% (4/41) 10.5% (2/19)
Better able to assume functions since the training Yes for 88% (36/41) -
Better able to give presentations Yes for 73% (30/41) Yes for 58% (11/19)
Better able to train others Yes for 80% (33/41) Yes for 68% (13/19)
Better professional relations since the training Yes for 85% (35/41) -
Development of new activities since the training Yes for 80% (33/41) -
Development of a project as:
 Principal investigator Yes for 34% (14/41) Yes for 37% (7/19)
 Collaborator Yes for 68% (28/41) Yes for 68% (13/19)
Obtained funding as:
 Principal investigator Yes for 20% (8/41) Yes for 21% (4/19)
 Collaborator Yes for 44% (18/41) Yes for 37% (7/19)
Training has helped with grant applications and obtaining funding Yes for 63% (26/41) -
Change in professional activities since the training (as assessed by third party/superior) Yes for 78% (32/41) -

The survey of matched controls included colleagues of former participants. The questionnaires were distributed, by the former participants, to colleagues with similar training, in a similar post, dealing with malaria, tuberculosis or AIDS.