Skip to main content
. 2008 Feb 5;275(1638):991–1000. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2007.1425

Table 1.

Demonstrated variation in female preferences for purported indicators of good genes across the cycle. (‘+’ indicates that a significant effect (an overall preference or preference for a short-term mate at 0.05 level of statistical significance using a directed test) was detected. ‘−’ indicates that no such effect was detected. (In no case was a significant effect in the unpredicted direction detected. Hence, minuses connote null effects.) The interaction effect refers to finding a greater shift for ratings of attractiveness in a short-term relationship (men's sexiness) than long-term relationship. ‘0’ means that the effect was not examined in the study. A few studies also examined differences in preferences as a function of whether women were in long-term committed relationships or single. This table does not report these effects.)

trait study positive finding? interaction w relat. context
masculine features
scent of social dominance Havlicek et al. (2005) + 0
scent of androstenone Grammer (1993) + 0
Hummel et al. (1991) + 0
scent of testosterone Rantala et al. (2006) 0
masculine face Penton-Voak et al. (1999) study 1 + 0
Penton-Voak et al. (1999) study 2 + +
Penton-Voak & Perrett (2000) + 0
Johnston et al. (2001) + +
Scarbrough & Johnston (2005)
Jones et al. (2005a) + 0
facial features associated with high testosterone Roney & Simmons 2008 + 0
masculine body Little et al. (2007a) + +
Gangestad et al. (2007) + +
masculine voice Puts (2005) + +
Feinberg et al. (2006) + 0
dominant behaviour Gangestad et al. (2004) (see also Gangestad et al. 2007) + +
tall height Pawlowski & Jasienska (2005) + +
dark (masculine) skin Frost (1994) + 0
correlates of symmetry
scent of symmetry Gangestad & Thornhill (1998) + 0
Thornhill & Gangestad (1999) + 0
Rikowski & Grammer (1999) + 0
Thornhill et al. (2003) + 0
facial features associated with body symmetry Thornhill & Gangestad (2003) + 0
facial symmetry Koehler et al. (2002)
Koehler et al. (2006)
Cardenas & Harris (2007) 0
Little et al. (2007b), study 1 + 0
Little et al. (2007b), study 2 + +
purported mental fitness indicators
creative talent (versus wealth) Haselton & Miller (2006) + +
intelligent appearance Gangestad et al. (2007)
compatible genes
scent of MHC dissimilarity Thornhill et al. (2003) 0