Skip to main content
. 2008 Mar 5;46(5):1647–1654. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02018-07

TABLE 5.

Performance of IgG against panels of recombinant antigensa

Model % Error rate (no. of positive samples/total no. of samples) % Sensitivity (no. of positive samples/total no. of samples) % Specificity (no. of positive samples/total no. of samples)
Full model (with 15 predictors) 3.7 (3/82)* 96.6 (57/59)* 95.6 (22/23)*
SET1, ENO1, FBA1, PGK1-1, PGK1-2, MUC1-2, BGL21 3.7 (3/82)* 96.6 (57/59)* 95.6 (22/23)*
SET1, ENO1, PGK1-2, MUC1-2 3.7 (3/82)* 96.6 (57/59)* 95.6 (22/23)*
SET1, ENO1, MUC1-2 4.8 (4/84) 95.0 (57/60) 95.8 (23/24)
a

* indicates that one patient with systemic candidiasis and one control did not have sufficient sera to test against PGK1-1 and PGK1-2.