Skip to main content
. 2004 Jan 6;90(1):41–47. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601519

Table 1. Psychological characteristics of the three trial groups at baseline and postintervention.

  Baseline (n=163) Postintervention (n=151)
  Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 1 Group 2 Group 3
Variable (n=56)b (n=53)c (n=54)d (n=51) (n=49) (n=51)
Cancer Worry Scale: median (range) 9 (6–20) 9 (6–17) 10 (6–21) 9 (6–16) 9 (6–24) 9 (6–16)
Objective knowledge: median (range)e            
 Total correct 17.5 (6–28) 17 (8–35) 15(7–31) 24 (3–33) 27 (11–36) 15 (5–33)
 Total incorrect 9 (3–18) 8(1–19) 8 (1–15) 8 (2–18) 7 (0–13) 9 (2–17)
 Total ‘don't know’ 9 (0–23) 10.5 (0–21) 12 (0–22) 2 (0–26) 1 (0–16) 12.5 (0–25)
Impact of Event Scale: median (range)f            
 Intrusion 8 (0–33) 6 (0–25) 5 (0–27) 9 (0–13) 11(0–35) 3.5 (0–25)
 Avoidance 9 (0–26) 8 (0–23) 9 (0–30) 10.5 (0–29) 16 (0–40) 5.5 (0–30)
 Total score 18 (0–59) 12.5 (0–47) 13 (0–51) 18 (0–42) 30 (0–75) 8.5 (0–51)
GHQ-12:            
 Total score: median (range) 1 (0–11) 0 (0–12) 0 (0–12) 0 (0–11) 0 (0–12) 0 (0–10)
 ‘Case-level’ distress: n (%)g 17 (30%) 10 (20%) 20 (37%) 7 (14%) 7 (14%) 12 (25%)
Perceived likelihood of developing            
breast cancer: n (%)            
 Unlikely 15 (27%) 13 (26%) 17 (33%) 16 (34%) 19 (41%) 14 (28%)
 Likely 41 (73%) 38 (75%) 35 (67%) 31 (66%) 27 (59%) 36 (72%)
Perceived control over developing            
breast cancer: n (%)            
 None at all 18 (32%) 21 (40%) 16 (30%) 6 (12%) 14 (29%) 18 (35%)
 Some 38 (68%) 32 (60%) 38 (70%) 44 (88%) 34 (71%) 33 (65%)
a

Sample size varies due to missing data.

b

Group 1 received the scientific and psychosocial information pack.

c

Group 2 received the scientific information pack.

d

Group 3 received standard care only (control group).

e

Possible range of scores: 0–36.

f

A total of 71 participants (44%) at baseline and 52 (35%) postintervention indicated that they had thought about the risk of breast cancer in the past week and therefore completed the Impact of Event Scale.

g

Scores of ⩾3.