Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2008 Mar;181(2):119–124. doi: 10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2007.11.008

Table 1.

Karyotypic Findings in Aggressive Angiomyxoma

Reference: Age/Sex Karyotype HMGA2 Rearrangement by FISH HMGA2 Immunoperoxidase
1 Horsman 1991 [11] 42/F 45-50,XX,-12,-5,+der(5)t(5q15;?),-16,+der(16)t(5q;16q),-15,+der(15)t(15ql3;?)(l-4),+/-frag NP NP
2 Betz 1995 [14] 32/F 46,XX,t(7;12)(q22-31;q13-14)[14] NP NP
3 Kazmierczak 1995 [12] & 1998 [13] 44/F 46,XX/46,XX,t(5;12)(q31;p11.2),der(12)inv(12)(p11.2;q14)t(5;12)(q31;p11.2)[50] Positive NP
4 Kenny-Moynihan 1996 [15] 16/F 45,X,-X[8] NP NP
5 Nucci 1999 &Nucci 2001 [16, 17] 18*/F 46,XX,t(8;12)(p12;q15) Negative Positive
6 Micci 2006 [18] 44/F 46,XX,t(11;12)(q23;q15)[16] Negative Positive
7 Rabban 2006 [38] 34/F NP Positive Negative
8 Medeira 2007 [19] 53/F 46, XX,t(1;12)(p32;q15)[20] Positive NP
9 49/F 46, XX Negative NP
10 Current Case 72/F 46,XX,t(12;21)(q15;q21.1)[20] Positive Positive

NP = not performed;

*

Patient initially presented at age 18, but study material for cytogenetics was obtained on resection of a second recurrence at age 24