Table 3.
Correlations among fractional anisotropy and RT variables for younger adults
| Variables | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) Hit RT | – | |||||||||
| (2) Correct rejection RT | 0.833** | – | ||||||||
| (3) Perceptual-motor speed | 0.324 | 0.457 | – | |||||||
| (4) PCF | −0.149 | −0.276 | −0.427 | – | ||||||
| (5) ASL | 0.108 | 0.032 | 0.175 | 0.054 | – | |||||
| (6) PSL | −0.032 | −0.164 | 0.061 | 0.452 | 0.420 | – | ||||
| (7) UNC | −0.083 | −0.199 | −0.249 | 0.585** | 0.002 | 0.355 | – | |||
| (8) CIN | −0.089 | 0.058 | −0.137 | 0.332 | −0.120 | 0.261 | 0.416 | – | ||
| (9) GNU | 0.119 | 0.285 | 0.201 | −0.277 | −0.197 | −0.251 | −0.048 | 0.122 | – | |
| (10) SPN | −0.032 | 0.129 | −0.265 | 0.277 | −0.328 | −0.272 | 0.375 | 0.382 | 0.458* | – |
p < 0.05.
p < 0.01.