Table 4.
Correlations among fractional anisotropy and RT variables for older adults
| Variables | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) Hit RT | – | |||||||||
| (2) Correct rejection RT | 0.777** | – | ||||||||
| (3) Perceptual-motor speed | 0.205 | 0.452 | – | |||||||
| (4) PCF | −0.493* | −0.613** | 0.114 | – | ||||||
| (5) ASL | 0.210 | −0.002 | −0.092 | −0.124 | – | |||||
| (6) PSL | −0.152 | −0.087 | 0.152 | 0.237 | 0.367 | – | ||||
| (7) UNC | −0.271 | −0.270 | 0.180 | 0.370 | 0.191 | 0.251 | – | |||
| (8) CIN | 0.180 | 0.014 | 0.052 | 0.372 | −0.102 | −0.178 | 0.233 | – | ||
| (9) GNU | −0.493* | −0.565** | −0.323 | 0.405 | −0.325 | 0.169 | 0.119 | 0.005 | – | |
| (10) SPN | −0.109 | −0.151 | 0.294 | 0.410 | −0.488* | 0.010 | 0.011 | 0.505* | 0.200 | – |
p < 0.05.
p < 0.01.