Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 May 27.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2008 Mar 11;130(13):4352–4363. doi: 10.1021/ja076817a

Table 2.

EXAFS Curve-Fitting Results for 9-P, 10, and 11a

sample fit no. R (Å) σ2 × 1062) ΔE0 (eV) Fb
9-P 1 5 O/Nc 2.10 1200 −6.2 0.497
4 C 3.06 660
2 4 O/N 2.12 900 −3.9 0.400
2 C/O 2.50 830
4 C 3.07 600
3 4 O/N 2.12 900 −3.8 0.393
2 C/O 2.49 860
0.2 Fe 2.92 650
4 C 3.09 510
10 4 6 O/N 2.05 1300 0.7 0.331
5 C 3.04 340
5 6 O/N 2.05 1280 0.1 0.280
1 Fed 3.03 400
5 Cd 3.00 1520
11 6 6 O/N 2.02 840 0.7 0.298
5 C 3.00 270
7 6 O/N 2.02 820 0.0 0.241
1 Fed 3.00 400
5 Cd 2.94 1160
a

Errors are estimated to be 25% for coordination numbers and 0.01 − 0.03 Å for distances.

b

Error (F) is defined as F = [Σk6exptl — χcalcd)2]/Σk6| χexptl2].

c

Scatterers differing by Z = ±1 are not distinguishable by EXAFS. The first element in a pair indicates the type of atom used to model the backscattered wave in the theoretical fit.

d

Due to a high degree of correlation, the errors for the Fe—Fe and Fe—C distances at ∼3.0 Å are estimated to be around 0.05 Å.