Skip to main content
. 2008 May 8;8:47. doi: 10.1186/1472-6750-8-47

Table 1.

LRE-based absolute quantification of eleven cDNA targets using five enzyme formulations.

Gain: X8 X8 X2 X2 X1
OCF: 1092 1155 704 778 345
Enzyme: QT 0XSG QT 0.2XSG DyNa 0.5XSG DyNa 1.5XSG FV 2.0XSG LRE-No Average CV (+/-)
Target
CHS K3K4 6,143 7,323 5,658 8,500 11,598 7,844 30.2%
SE K3K2 4,828 5,444 5,103 6,363 nd 5,435 12.3%
PHB K3K2 2,951 3,292 2,646 3,733 2,956 3,116 13.3%
EMF2 K2K3 2,301 3,256 3,094 2,752 nd 2,851 14.8%
NPR1 K1K4 1,872 1,973 1,565 1,657 2,334 1,880 16.0%
ANT K3K4 970 1,390 756 1,139 1,446 1,140 25.3%
FLF K3K4 661 553 466 596 nd 569 14.4%
HAP3C K3K4 145 198 254 255 nd 213 24.7%
ABI3 K3K4 66 105 129 122 48 94 37.8%
AP3 K3K4 38 52 61 34 22 41 37.3%
Lec2 K3K4 6 14 12 12 9 11 31.4%

Av. CV: 23.4%

Following LRE analysis (summarized in Figure 7), the FC readings encompassed by the LRE window were converted to F0 (see Figure 3) and the average F0 value converted to the number of target molecules (LRE-N0) using the OCF generated by each respective reaction formulation (see Figure 6 and additional file 3 for more details). The gain setting was adjusted to prevent saturation of the photomultiplier (see Figure 2). Gain: the photomultiplier gain setting, OCF: optical calibration factor (FU/ng dsDNA), QT: QuantiTect, DyNa: DyNAmo; FV: FullVelocity, SG: SYBR Green I, SD: standard deviation, nd: not determined.