Table 1.
Gain: | X8 | X8 | X2 | X2 | X1 | ||
OCF: | 1092 | 1155 | 704 | 778 | 345 | ||
Enzyme: | QT 0XSG | QT 0.2XSG | DyNa 0.5XSG | DyNa 1.5XSG | FV 2.0XSG | LRE-No Average | CV (+/-) |
Target | |||||||
CHS K3K4 | 6,143 | 7,323 | 5,658 | 8,500 | 11,598 | 7,844 | 30.2% |
SE K3K2 | 4,828 | 5,444 | 5,103 | 6,363 | nd | 5,435 | 12.3% |
PHB K3K2 | 2,951 | 3,292 | 2,646 | 3,733 | 2,956 | 3,116 | 13.3% |
EMF2 K2K3 | 2,301 | 3,256 | 3,094 | 2,752 | nd | 2,851 | 14.8% |
NPR1 K1K4 | 1,872 | 1,973 | 1,565 | 1,657 | 2,334 | 1,880 | 16.0% |
ANT K3K4 | 970 | 1,390 | 756 | 1,139 | 1,446 | 1,140 | 25.3% |
FLF K3K4 | 661 | 553 | 466 | 596 | nd | 569 | 14.4% |
HAP3C K3K4 | 145 | 198 | 254 | 255 | nd | 213 | 24.7% |
ABI3 K3K4 | 66 | 105 | 129 | 122 | 48 | 94 | 37.8% |
AP3 K3K4 | 38 | 52 | 61 | 34 | 22 | 41 | 37.3% |
Lec2 K3K4 | 6 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 9 | 11 | 31.4% |
Av. CV: | 23.4% |
Following LRE analysis (summarized in Figure 7), the FC readings encompassed by the LRE window were converted to F0 (see Figure 3) and the average F0 value converted to the number of target molecules (LRE-N0) using the OCF generated by each respective reaction formulation (see Figure 6 and additional file 3 for more details). The gain setting was adjusted to prevent saturation of the photomultiplier (see Figure 2). Gain: the photomultiplier gain setting, OCF: optical calibration factor (FU/ng dsDNA), QT: QuantiTect, DyNa: DyNAmo; FV: FullVelocity, SG: SYBR Green I, SD: standard deviation, nd: not determined.