Table 2.
Category | Site | Contact | Context |
Non-repetitive | 0.407 ± 0.085 | 0.410 ± 0.074 | 0.400 ± 0.110 |
All repeats | 0.115 ± 0.042 | 0.130 ± 0.041 | 0.088 ± 0.045 |
All SSR | 0.170 ± 0.056 | 0.183 ± 0.052 | 0.145 ± 0.062 |
All TEs | 0.047 ± 0.026 | 0.059 ± 0.026 | 0.028 ± 0.026 |
Alu | 0.002 ± 0.002 | 0.003 ± 0.003 | 0.002 ± 0.001 |
MIR | 0.028 ± 0.017 | 0.048 ± 0.026 | 0.003 ± 0.004 |
L1 | 0.068 ± 0.063 | 0.077 ± 0.068 | 0.047 ± 0.052 |
All other LINEs | 0.066 ± 0.018 | 0.095 ± 0.022 | 0.012 ± 0.011 |
LTR | 0.141 ± 0.076 | 0.145 ± 0.042 | 0.136 ± 0.119 |
DNA | 0.043 ± 0.029 | 0.057 ± 0.038 | 0.016 ± 0.009 |
Average (± standard deviation) base-by-base conservation levels are shown for different categories, non-repetitive and repetitive, of human TFBS. TFBS derived from repetitive DNA are broken down SSR versus TE-derived, and TE-derived TFBS are divided into specific classes/families of elements. Base-by-base conservation levels were averaged separately across entire sites, and across contact versus context positions.