Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Magn Reson. 2007 Dec 31;191(2):248–258. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2007.12.015

Table 5.

Means ± SD and range (min, max) of the percentage errors in the estimated k calculated by different correction methods

Correction
method
Percent error in k, mean (bias) ± SD (min, max)
Progressive
saturation
FAST FAST*
Conventional, Eq. (3) 7.4 ± 16.0
(−17.9, 70.0)
−5.8 ± 13.4
(−29.3, 39.7)
−1.5 ± 7.4
(−17.0, 27.3)
HS, Eq. (4) −13.9 ± 15.2
(−35.6,−3.4)
−14.6 ± 16.2
(−33.7,−1.8)
−14.3 ± 15.7
(−33.5,−3.6)
KM, Eq. (5) −3.0 ± 5.1
(−18.4,4.4)
−11.0 ± 12.7
(−27.3,0.8)
−8.4 ± 9.3
(−18.9,−0.7)
Numerical inversion 0.6 ± 2.6
(−12.6, 9.5)
0.2 ± 5.7
(−20.2, 29.1)
0.2 ± 4.6
(−12.8, 31.3)
Eq. (10) 1.8 ± 4.0
(−8.0, 12.3)
0.0 ± 2.2
(−10.4, 7.1)
0.1 ± 1.3
(−5.5, 3.5)
Eq. (11) 1.8 ± 5.5
(−25.5, 8.6)
−0.3 ± 3.2
(−12.8, 8.0)
0.1 ± 2.9
(−9.3, 4.7)

The errors are calculated for progressive saturation and FAST over the range of parameters listed in Table 2; for 0.05 ⩽ k ⩽ 1.0 and for FAST with 0.1 ⩽ k ⩽ 0.5 (FAST*).