Skip to main content
. 2008 Apr;7(4):750–767. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M700399-MCP200

Table II.

Comparison of number of proteins identified by each search algorithm with decoy database FPR calculations and PeptideProphet and ProteinProphet probability calculations for both a minimum of one and two peptides per protein

For each FPR, all protein identifications were filtered by algorithm-specific peptide threshold cutoffs: SEQUEST: Xcorr and ΔCn; Mascot: identity and ion scores; and X!Tandem: log(e) value. PP, PeptideProphet & ProteinProphet probability.

Algorithm No. of proteins
1% FPR, 2 peptides 1% FPR, 1 peptide 5% FPR, 2 peptides 5% FPR, 1 peptide 95% PP, 2 peptides 95% PP, 1 peptide 90% PP, 2 peptides 90% PP, 1 peptide
SEQUEST 577 1176 631 1301 574 726 632 765
Mascot 587 1107 636 1159 578 713 630 720
X!Tandem 596 1256 648 1407 585 720 641 733