Skip to main content
. 2007 Jan 8;114(3):325–333. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01206.x

Table 2.

Cognitive, affective and behavioural outcomes

Cognitive, affective and behavioural outcomes Decision aid (n = 102)mean (SD) Usual care (n = 98)mean (SD) Mean difference (95% CI)
Decisional conflict (1–100, 1 = low decisional conflict
Baseline 45 (29.0) 43 (27.5) 2.74 (−6.56, 12.05)
First follow up 4.6 (9.0) 13.5 (19.2) −8.92 (−13.18, −4.66)
Second follow up 4.2 (12.5) 12.7 (20.9) −8.49 (−13.69, −3.29)
Knowledge (% correct responses)
Baseline 69 (28.7) 69 (25.8) −0.46 (−8.25, 7.33)
First follow up 88 (19) 79 (18) 8.40 (3.10, 13.71)
Satisfaction with decision making (6–30, 6 = low satisfaction)
First follow up 26.3 (3.9) 25.6 (4.1) 0.64 (−0.53, 1.81)
Second follow up 27.7 (3.0) 26.2 (3.6) 1.45 (0.44, 2.46)
Anxiety (20–80, 20 = low anxiety), n (%)
Baseline 45.8 (15.0) 47.4 (13.9) −1.65 (−5.73, 2.42)
First follow up 41.4 (12.5) 44.4 (13.9) −2.97 (−6.78, 0.84)
Second follow up 29.2 (9.9) 30.8 (10.5) −1.66 (−4.76, 1.44)
Positive attitude towards ECV (%)* 62.5 44.3 RR 1.41 (1.07, 1.85)
Values (1–7, 7 = very important)
Turning breech baby by ECV 5.3 (1.9) 4.5 (2.1) 0.74 (0.17, 1.32)
Adverse effects of ECV 4.4 (1.8) 3.8 (2.0) 0.58 (0.03, 1.13)
Enough information to make decision (%)
First follow up 95.7 73.6 RR 1.30 (1.14, 1.47)
Second follow up 90.0 77.0 RR 1.16 (1.02, 1.33)
Intention for ECV (%)
Baseline 74.0 66.0 RR 1.12 (0.93, 1.35)
First follow up 77.1 55.7 RR 1.38 (1.12, 1.70)
*

Proportion above overall median (18.5) = positive attitude.