Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Acad Radiol. 2008 Mar;15(3):334–341. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2007.10.005

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Scan quality is variable. Image A was consistently rated as good due to good colonic distension, low motion artifact, typical shape and well-defined tumor margins. Image B was consistently rated poor due to motion artifact, ill-defined tumor margins and proximity of a fecal pellet (arrowhead) to the tumor (arrow). Approximately 78% of microCT colonoscopies currently done in our lab are good or better.