Skip to main content
. 2004 Apr 27;90(10):1933–1941. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601826

Table 3. Distribution of prognostic markers.

    Grade
er %
bcl2 %
Cyclin D1 %
p27 %
    1 2 3 >20 <20 >70 31–69 <30 >70 31–69 <30 >70 31–69 <30
Tumour set 1 (On Tam) GOOD 11 6 6 11 11 7 4 12 8 6 9 8 3 10
  POOR 5 1 15 6 13 3 1 16 5 2 13 2 3 12
Tumour set 1 (Not on Tam) GOOD 9 7 8 13 9 10 3 12 9 5 9 4 6 9
  POOR 6 4 4 8 5 3 1 10 6 1 7 4 5 3
Tumour set 2 (On Tam) GOOD 20 11 9 31 10 15 5 21 33 1 7 21 5 15
  POOR 1 11 12 12 12 1 5 18 9 1 14 6 4 14
TOTAL (On Tam only) GOOD 31 17 15 42 21 22 9 33 41 7 16 29 8 25
  POOR 6 12 27 18 25 4 6 34 14 3 27 8 7 26