Skip to main content
. 2004 Apr 27;90(10):1920–1925. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601846

Table 3. Specialist and nonspecialist treatment of the axilla and breast, adequacy of treatment and relative risk of recurrence.

  Specialists
Nonspecialists
 
  No. % No. % P-value
Treatment of the Breast          
 Conservation Surgery 462/906 51.0 572/1242 46.1 0.026
 Inadequate conservation 104 22.5 285 49.8 <0.001
 Local recurrence ratea 7%   14%   <0.001
 RHR local recurrenceb 1.00   1.54   <0.001
      (1.10–2.20)    
           
Staging of the axilla          
 Rate of axillary staging 843/906 93.0 984/1242 79.2 <0.001
 Inadequate staging 69/906 7.6 503/1242 40.5 <0.001
           
Treatment of the axilla          
 Inadequate treatment 40/906 4.4 468/1242 37.7 <0.001
 Axillary recurrence rateb 6%   11%   <0.001
 RHR axillary recurrenceb 1.00   2.06   <0.001
      (1.48–2.88)    
           
Systemic treatment          
 Premenopausal women          
  Chemotherapy (CT) rate 72/238 30.3 49/326 15.0 <0.001
  Endocrine therapy (ET) rate 102/238 42.9 170/326 52.1 0.033
  CT or ET in prognostically poorc 84/101 83.2 98/127 77.2 0.320
 Postmenopausal women          
  Endocrine therapy rate 518/668 77.5 723/916 78.9 0.537
  CT or ET in prognostically poorc 241/282 85.5 276/332 83.1 0.440
a

Actuarial estimate at 8 years.

b

After adjustment for nodal status, tumour size and histological prognostic grade.

c

Tumours greater than 40 mm, node positive or poor histological prognostic group.