Skip to main content
. 2004 Feb 3;90(3):626–631. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601587

Table 2. Distribution of prognostic factors.

  Consecutive patients
Evaluable patients
Baseline patients
Week-5 patients
Prognostic group n=49 % n=46 % P n=34 % P n=25 % P
(a) MSKCCa
Favourable 3 6% 3 7% 0.66 2 6% 0.70 2 8% 0.59
Intermediate 25 51% 24 52%   16 47%   14 56%  
Poor 21 43% 19 41%   16 47%   9 36%  
 
(b) UISSb
  Baseline patients Week-5 patients              
  n=34 % n=25 % P            
UISS 3 6 18% 5 20% 1.00            
UISS 4 27 79% 19 76%              
UISS 5 1 3% 1 4%              

P=Fisher's exact test.

a

Motzer et al (1999). Risk factors: Karnofsky PS <80, LDH ⩾1.5 times upper limit of normal, haemoglobin <lower limit of normal, corrected s-Ca >10 mg dl−1 or ion-Ca >upper limit of normal and no prior nephrectomy. No risk factors=favourable prognosis, 1–2 risk factors=intermediate prognosis and >2 risk factors=poor prognosis.

b

UCLA Integrated Staging System (Zisman et al, 2001), based on TNM stage, Fuhrman grade and performance status.